Btrfs!

Slashdot Comments | Ext4 Advances As Interim Step To Btrfs: 

  1. You’re still running ext4? I can’t believe it’s not ButterFS!
  2. But will it run on toast?
  3. Will fsck be renamed to butterknife?
  4. If your system overheats will your filesystem melt?
  5. If you use ButterFS too much, will it turn into FAT?
  6. If you leave ButterFS on your volume too long, will your hard drive start to reek?
  7. Will the next version of ButterFS be called GoatButterFS, just like the next version of Leopard is Snow Leopard?
  8. “Tough” notebooks will never have their hard drives formatted with ButterFS, because if you dropped them, they would always land hard drive down.
  9. When you submit your dead ButterFS hard drive to a data recovery centre, will they have an intern lick it to get the data off instead of putting it under a read head?
  11. I hear some of the features in btrfs have been refined from ext3cow.
  12. I touch’d a file on a btrfs disk, and now it’s sticky!
  13. I hear the standard block size of btrfs is 8 oz.
  14. How can I make a business case for btrfs? I’m all for introducing new tech, but my boss only cares about how it will affect our margarins.
  15. Will btrfs keep my servers from grinding? I’m a bit worried that if they churn too much, my files will separate!
  16. And most importantly, In an emergency, can I use btrfs for a smoother fsck?